Stringent Point Profile System Evaluation criteria at ICSOC

Evaluation Criteria: A Successful Process

The evaluation criteria in institute recognition focus on the originality of the content or materials, and the teaching style helps develop the institute’s image and overall success. Similarly, ICSOC has its own evaluation criteria in which stringent point profile system evaluation criteria help to ensure that the institutes or trainers asking to be recognized are authentic. This process focuses on different aspects of criteria for institute, trainers, and courses, and these have been discussed below:

Evaluation Criteria for Institutes

1. ICSOC evaluates the curriculum and other secondary aspects and benefits offered by the institute, which helps understand the quality standard.
2. This evaluation also includes assessing the services and education based on the student’s perspective, which eventually helps understand their take on the online education process.
3. Another criterion is that the institute should only represent authentic documents, which could lead towards a delay in getting a recognition certificate.

Evaluation Criteria for Courses

1. One of the most challenging aspects nowadays is that numerous online courses are available, and the need to verify has become more critical than ever. So, getting recognized methods for either an institute or individual purposes is necessary.
2. The evaluation criteria focus on the ability to conduct tests, learning materials, and course curriculum, including presentation, research work, and class learning materials.
3. The ICSOC focuses on evaluating the core difference between courses as which course is instead developed on originality and creates professional value for their students.

Evaluation Criteria for Trainers

1. The role of trainers cannot be ignored as one might think that it shouldn’t be given much attention, but the reality is that these are the people who guide students on the right path and help develop their professional growth.
2. The strict judgment for trainers and their training focuses on their years of experience, age, relevancy in the industry, style of teaching and presentation in the class, merit selection, and number of certificates achieved. This criterion helps identify the difference between a good and best or certified student trainer.
3. Another criterion is that ICSOC evaluates the professional portfolio of the trainer as it allows them to identify and understand their overall growth before this evaluation and identify whether this specific trainer could help improve their educational and professional development.